"endoconsistency" meaning in All languages combined

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "endo",
        "3": "consistency"
      },
      "expansion": "endo- + consistency",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From endo- + consistency.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "endoconsistencies",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "~"
      },
      "expansion": "endoconsistency (countable and uncountable, plural endoconsistencies)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English entries with incorrect language header",
          "parents": [
            "Entries with incorrect language header",
            "Entry maintenance"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "English terms prefixed with endo-",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with 1 entry",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "other",
          "name": "Pages with entries",
          "parents": [],
          "source": "w"
        },
        {
          "kind": "topical",
          "langcode": "en",
          "name": "Philosophy",
          "orig": "en:Philosophy",
          "parents": [
            "All topics",
            "Fundamental"
          ],
          "source": "w"
        }
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, What Is Philosophy?, →ISBN, page 137:",
          "text": "Now, according to the two aspects of Gödoel's theorem, proof of the consistency of arithmetic cannot be represented within the system (there is no endoconsistency), and the system necessarily comes up against true statements that are nevertheless not demonstrable, are undecidable (there is no exoconsistency, or the consistent system cannot be complete).",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1998, Lohren David Green, Interpreting Nietzche: The Role of Style in the History of Philosophy:",
          "text": "The concept just always is its consistency in its variations: “the concept is defined by its consistency, its endoconsistency and exoconsistency, but it has no reference; it is self-referential.”",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2000, South African Journal of Philosophy - Volume 19, Issues 2-4, page 291:",
          "text": "Components, or what defines the consistency of the concept, its endoconsistency, are distinct, heterogeneous, and yet not separable.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, Thomas Nail, Returning to Revolution: Deleuze, Guattari and Zapatismo, →ISBN, page 126:",
          "text": "The concrete machinic assemblage, according to Deleuze and BGuattari, has an internal or endoconsistency that 'renders components inseparable within itself'.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Internal consistency; the fusion of components into an inseparable whole."
      ],
      "id": "en-endoconsistency-en-noun-dIv7Wpaq",
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "Internal",
          "internal"
        ],
        [
          "consistency",
          "consistency"
        ],
        [
          "fusion",
          "fusion"
        ],
        [
          "component",
          "component"
        ],
        [
          "inseparable",
          "inseparable"
        ],
        [
          "whole",
          "whole"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) Internal consistency; the fusion of components into an inseparable whole."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "countable",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "endoconsistency"
}

{
  "etymology_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "en",
        "2": "endo",
        "3": "consistency"
      },
      "expansion": "endo- + consistency",
      "name": "prefix"
    }
  ],
  "etymology_text": "From endo- + consistency.",
  "forms": [
    {
      "form": "endoconsistencies",
      "tags": [
        "plural"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "head_templates": [
    {
      "args": {
        "1": "~"
      },
      "expansion": "endoconsistency (countable and uncountable, plural endoconsistencies)",
      "name": "en-noun"
    }
  ],
  "lang": "English",
  "lang_code": "en",
  "pos": "noun",
  "senses": [
    {
      "categories": [
        "English countable nouns",
        "English entries with incorrect language header",
        "English lemmas",
        "English nouns",
        "English terms prefixed with endo-",
        "English terms with quotations",
        "English uncountable nouns",
        "Pages with 1 entry",
        "Pages with entries",
        "en:Philosophy"
      ],
      "examples": [
        {
          "ref": "1996, Gilles Deleuze, Félix Guattari, What Is Philosophy?, →ISBN, page 137:",
          "text": "Now, according to the two aspects of Gödoel's theorem, proof of the consistency of arithmetic cannot be represented within the system (there is no endoconsistency), and the system necessarily comes up against true statements that are nevertheless not demonstrable, are undecidable (there is no exoconsistency, or the consistent system cannot be complete).",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "1998, Lohren David Green, Interpreting Nietzche: The Role of Style in the History of Philosophy:",
          "text": "The concept just always is its consistency in its variations: “the concept is defined by its consistency, its endoconsistency and exoconsistency, but it has no reference; it is self-referential.”",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2000, South African Journal of Philosophy - Volume 19, Issues 2-4, page 291:",
          "text": "Components, or what defines the consistency of the concept, its endoconsistency, are distinct, heterogeneous, and yet not separable.",
          "type": "quote"
        },
        {
          "ref": "2012, Thomas Nail, Returning to Revolution: Deleuze, Guattari and Zapatismo, →ISBN, page 126:",
          "text": "The concrete machinic assemblage, according to Deleuze and BGuattari, has an internal or endoconsistency that 'renders components inseparable within itself'.",
          "type": "quote"
        }
      ],
      "glosses": [
        "Internal consistency; the fusion of components into an inseparable whole."
      ],
      "links": [
        [
          "philosophy",
          "philosophy"
        ],
        [
          "Internal",
          "internal"
        ],
        [
          "consistency",
          "consistency"
        ],
        [
          "fusion",
          "fusion"
        ],
        [
          "component",
          "component"
        ],
        [
          "inseparable",
          "inseparable"
        ],
        [
          "whole",
          "whole"
        ]
      ],
      "raw_glosses": [
        "(philosophy) Internal consistency; the fusion of components into an inseparable whole."
      ],
      "tags": [
        "countable",
        "uncountable"
      ],
      "topics": [
        "human-sciences",
        "philosophy",
        "sciences"
      ]
    }
  ],
  "word": "endoconsistency"
}